12. DERIVING THE TRANSFORMATION
OF COORDINATES BASED ON THE SATISFACTION OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR INVARIABILITY
As was mentioned before,
the Galilean transformation maintains the invariability
of equation of the basic laws of mechanical motion in inertial systems.
However, this is not the case for equation of the laws in electromagnetism,
so new transformations have to be found, which are derived from the condition
of invariability of certain equations in the given area. Some of these
examples will be treated in the further text.
The propagation of the spherical electromagnetic (or sound) wave has
been given in a system
by the following equation
![]() |
(12.1) |
If we suppose that the system
moves continuously and translatory in relation
to
so that its
-axis moves along the
-axis,
whereas the
-axis remains parallel to the
-axis
and the
-axis parallel to the
-axis, we
obtain the transformational formulas as in one-dimensional case.
The invariability of Eq. (12.1) for the propagation of an electromagnetic
spherical wave requires that the propagation of the given wave can be presented
by the same equation in a system
as well, which would then
be as follows
![]() |
(12.2) |
Let the transformational formula
for the coordinate
be
![]() |
(12.3) |
where is
coefficient which is determined by the comparison.
For the coordinates
and
the transformational formulas are
![]() |
(12.4) |
Let the transformational formula for time
be
![]() |
(12.5) |
where
and
are the coefficients
which are also determined by the comparison.
When the substitution of the expression for
,
,
and
is done in Eq. (12.2) we obtain
![]() |
or
![]() |
(12.6) |
Comparison of the coefficients of
,
,
and
in Eqs. (12.1) and (12.6) gives
![]() |
(12.7) |
Solving Eqs. (12.7) we obtain the coefficients
![]() |
(12.8) |
Substitution of these expressions in Eqs. (12.3) and (12.5) gives relativistic formulas for the coordinates and time which Lorentz derived
![]() |
(12.9) |
Thus, we obtained the same equations for a case of propagation of the
spherical wave as in case of Lorentz transformation, but in a more correct
mathematical way.
This does not exclude the possibility of deriving the other transformations
as well. For the need of further consideration we will derive two new transformations
for the case of spherical wave propagation and two for the case of plane
wave propagation. As before, for the spherical wave we will use Eqs. (12.1)
and (12.2) and the following transformational formulas
![]() |
(12.10) |
In the same way, as in previous case, in obtaining Eqs. (12.9)
we find expressions for coefficients
,
and
![]() |
(12.11) |
so that
![]() |
(12.12) |
As in case of relativistic Eqs. (11.1) it is also obtained that
![]() |
(12.13) |
In Eqs. (12.12) and (12.13) the velocity
is not limited
to the velocity
, so, it is allowed to be
.
We obtain the fifth transformation of coordinates on the basis of the
requirement of invariability for the equation of the plane wave so that
the relation
![]() |
(12.14) |
is identically satisfied, and transformational equations
![]() |
(12.15) |
As before we determine coefficients
and
by
the comparison using Eqs. (12.14) and (12.15) which gives
![]() |
(12.16) |
so that
![]() |
(12.17) |
In these equations the velocity
is also not limited, so it can be
.
Eq. (12.17) most clearly describes the propagation of a light plane
wave (or a sound plane wave) in an inertial system. In them lengths are
"clear", which means that they are not multiplied by any coefficient. The
times are given by simple formulas.
Time
is smaller than time
for a coefficient (
), which is,
from the standpoint of a light waves propagation,
clear in the sense of physics, if the flow of the events is observed in
the direction of a wave motion. For example, if the system
is moved at velocity
then its origin would always be at the
same light wave (
= 0).
Then the time would stop flowing in that coordinate
system, because there would be no change in the electromagnetic situation.
From the direction of the origin of the system
no electromagnetic
phenomena, such as a light pulse, succeeds in reaching that system and
they always stay at the same distance, like the others in front of them.
Under these conditions it seems that everything has stopped, in a sense
of propagation of the electromagnetic waves in the direction of motion.
For example, if
then the number of electromagnetic waves
which pass through the origin of the system
are two times smaller
than it would be if the system
were at rest in relation to
the system
. Because of this the number of events is two times smaller,
so it seems as if time passes more slowly. This can be of great significance
in regard to the life time of some phenomena or things.
For example let us suppose,
that a rocket starts to fly from a point
at speed
toward a point
,
with the intention of destroying
some target. Let the system in the rocket be programmed to activate an
explosive when it receives 20 radio pulses from the earth, which are sent
there every second. The question is: What is the life time of the rocket
from the moment it receives the first pulse at point
,
till the explosion
and its destruction? Counting the pulses we could say that it is 20 seconds,
since 20 pulses altogether are sent from the earth, that is, one pulse
per second. However, since the rocket flies at speed
it will
receive 20 pulses and activate the explosive, only, after 40 seconds. According
to the rocket's clock, which is synchronized with the radio pulse receiver,
and which is programmed to count time according to received number of pulses
on the earth at rest, the life time of the rocket is 20 seconds. But, naturally,
if the clock was set to work independently, that is at its own speed, it
would show the actual life time, which would be, as we said 40 seconds.
If the rocket flew in the opposite direction,
from the point
towards the point
, at the same speed as in the previous case, then
the actual life time of the rocket would be 13.3 sec, and the counter -
synchrony clock in the rocket would again show 20 seconds.
The second Eq. (12.17) can show the time of the past.
So if
,
the coordinate system
goes in front of the light wave (in the
same way as the supersonic airplane flies in front of the sound). In its
way it catches up with and outruns the waves had started earlier, and gives
the picture of the past. In such a way, for example, it could reach the
rays of sun's light reflected from a warrior's armor at the Battle of Kosovo
in 1389, making possible for the observer in that coordinate system to
see the battle but in reverse, as when we rewind a film tape. This is the
sense of the negative time in Eq. (12.17).
The following transformation number six, is also derived by using Eq.
(12.14) of the plane wave propagation and transformational formulas
![]() |
(12.18) |
After determining the coefficients
and
by comparison we obtain
![]() |
(12.19) |
Besides the given transformations, others of a similar form can be derived as well. Lorentz gave one coordinates transformation. However, as it has been shown, there are the other transformations with which is achieved an identical satisfaction of relation connected with propagation of a spherical light wave
![]() |
or relation connected with propagation of a plane light wave
![]() |
when left instead of
,
,
and
we
put their expression depending on
,
,
and
.
This requirement for an identical satisfaction was emphasized by Einstein
himself in the earlier quoted citation "The simple derivation of Lorentz
transformation". All transformations which achieve the invariability of
equation of propagation of the spherical or of the plane wave are of the
same validity.
With the transformed coordinates in case of a spherical wave, there
is no identical satisfaction of relation
connected with the
plane wave propagation. Also with transformed coordinates in case of
a plane wave, identical satisfaction of relation
![]() |
connected with the spherical light wave propagation cannot be obtained.
A spherical wave appears in case of radiation sources of very small
dimensions, and the plane wave appears at a collimated radiation. Michelson
and Morley's experiment and Fizeau's test were performed by using plane
waves. All interferometric measurements are made by use of plane waves,
because for a such measurements it is necessary to have a collimated radiation.
Finally, before we consider the basic characteristics of the derived
transformations, we present them together, for the sake of easier comparison.
a) Lorentz transformation
![]() |
(12.20) |
b) The new transformation, in the further text transformation No. 1
![]() |
(12.21) |
c) The new transformation, in the further text transformation No. 2
![]() |
(12.22) |
d) The new transformation, in the further text transformation No. 3
![]() |
(12.23) |
e) The new transformation, in the further text transformation No. 4
![]() |
(12.24) |
f) The new transformation, in the further text transformation No. 5
![]() |
(12.25) |
The Lorentz transformation and transformation No. 1, which has been
derived from the Lorentz transformation,
exclude the possibility that velocity
of the coordinate system
can be greater than the speed of light
and all other transformations allow that possibility.
Transformation No. 2 has one paradox.
The origin of the system
even at velocity
higher than the velocity of light, stays inside
the sphere formed by the spherical wave, which propagates at the velocity
of light from the origin of the system
. This means, for example,
that the light wave moves at the velocity of light in the positive direction
of the
-axis, and after it the origin of system
moves in the same direction, at a much higher velocity than that of light,
but for all that never reaches that light wave.
So, the origin of the system
cannot go out of the sphere of that spherical light wave, in spite of its
own so high velocity.
Transformation No. 3 contains another paradox.
The origin of system
can leave the sphere, formed by the spherical light wave, if it moves in
the negative direction of the
-axis and with higher velocity
than the velocity of light. Naturally, for that, the light wave observed
moves in a positive direction of
-axis.
When
the
origin of system
has left the sphere, but backwards.
Another paradox is that the relative velocity, between the light wave
and the origin of system
, which move in opposite directions, is
equal to the velocity of light even when system
moves at an
unlimited velocity
, that is
![]() |
In fact, this paradox occurs with all transformations, but with some,
for example with the Lorentz transformation, the speed
is limited
to a value
less than
.
Thus, according to Einstein, it
turns out that the relative speed of a light ray apex and the origin of
the system
do not depend on the system's direction of motion
relatively to the ray's direction of motion. That is in conflict with common
sense and human experience. In nature there are no such paradoxes, so we
can put the question whether the theory with such paradoxes and postulates
can describe and interpret physical processes. The answer to this question
is certainly negative.
From the examples given above we can see that it is not the physical
process of motion in question, but pure mathematics, where the variables,
time and length, are defined and changed in case of necessity without any
relation to real space and time, with the exception of transformation No.
4 where this connection can be established in some way.
home